- Proposed Amendments/Provisions to Enable Diaspora Voting
In order to address the electoral injustice faced by Nigerians living in the diaspora, it is recommended that Sections 77(2) and 117(2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), as well as Section 12(1) of the Electoral Act, 2022, be amended to read as follows:
Section 77 (2) CFRN 1999
Every citizen of Nigeria, who has attained the age of eighteen years residing within or outside Nigeria at the time of the registration of voters for purposes of election to a legislative house, shall be entitled to be registered as a voter for that election.
Section 12 (1) (a) – (e) of the Electoral Act 2022 can be amended by adding subsection (f) to read as follows.
A person shall be qualified to be registered as a voter if such a person—
(a) is a citizen of Nigeria;
(b) has attained the age of 18 years;
(c) is ordinarily resident, works in, originates from the Local Government, Area Council or Ward covered by the registration centre;
(d) presents himself to the registration officers of the Commission for registration as a voter; and
(e) is not subject to any legal incapacity to vote under any law, rule or regulations in force in Nigeria.
(f) The Independent National Electoral Commission shall establish guidelines to enable a citizen resident outside Nigeria, who has attained the age of 18 years, to be registered as a voter and to vote in any election in Nigeria. - Proposed Amendments/Provisions to Enable Independent Candidacy
In order to address the limitations imposed on independent candidacy in elections, the following amendments to the Constitution and the Electoral Act, 2022, are proposed:
Section 221 (1) and (2) CFRN 1999
(1) A political party shall canvass for votes for any candidate at any election or contribute to the funds of any political party or to the election expenses of any candidate at an election.
(2) A person, not being a member of a political party, may canvass for votes and fund his or her own election expenses as an independent candidate in an election.
Section 65 (1) CFRN 1999
Subject to the provisions of section 66 of this Constitution, a person shall be qualified for election as a member of:
(a) the Senate, if he is a citizen of Nigeria and has attained the age of 35 years; and
(b) the House of Representatives, if he is a citizen of Nigeria and has attained the age of 30 years;
(2) A person shall be qualified for election under subsection (1) of this section if:
(a) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent; and
(b) he is either an independent candidate or a member of a political party and is sponsored by that party.
Section 106 CFRN 1999
Subject to the provisions of section 107 of this Constitution, a person shall be qualified for election as a member of a House of Assembly if –
(a) he is a citizen of Nigeria;
(b) he has attained the age of thirty years;
(c) he has been educated up to at least the School Certificate level or its equivalent; and
(d) he is either an independent candidate or a member of a political party and is sponsored by that party.
Section 131 CFRN 1999
A person shall be qualified for election to the office of the President if –
(a) he is a citizen of Nigeria by birth;
(b) he has attained the age of forty years;
(c) he is either an independent candidate or a member of a political party and is sponsored by that political party; and
(d) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent.
Section 142 CFRN 1999
(1) In any election to which the foregoing provisions of this Part of this Chapter relate, a candidate sponsored by a political party for an election to the office of President shall not be deemed to be validly nominated unless he nominates another candidate as his associate from the same political party for his running for the office of President, who is to occupy the office of Vice-President and that candidate shall be deemed to have been duly elected to the office of Vice President if the candidate for an election to the office of President who nominated him as such associate is duly elected as President in accordance with the provisions aforesaid.
Provided that where such person is an independent candidate he shall nominate another independent candidate as his associate for his running for the office of President, who is to occupy the office of Vice-President.
Section 177 CFRN 1999
A person shall be qualified for election to the office of Governor of a State if
(a) he is a citizen of Nigeria by birth;
(b) he has attained the age of thirty-five years;
(c) he is either an independent candidate or a member of a political party and is sponsored by that political party; and
(d) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent.
Section 101 Electoral Act 2022
A person shall be qualified for election under this Part of this Act if he or she—
(a) is a citizen of Nigeria;
(b) is registered as a voter;
(c) has attained the age of 25 years for Councilor and 30 years for Chairman and Vice Chairman;
(d) is educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent; and
(e) is either an independent candidate or a member of a political party and is sponsored by that party.
Section 42 (1) Electoral Act 2022
The Commission shall prescribe the format of the ballot papers, which shall include the symbol of the candidate’s political party or, in the case of an independent candidate, the image of the candidate, along with any other information the Commission may require.
(2) The ballot papers shall be numbered serially with differentiating colours for each office being contested.
(3) The Commission shall, not later than 20 days to an election, invite in writing, the independent candidate or a political party that nominated a candidate in the election to inspect its identity appearing on samples of relevant electoral materials proposed for the election and the independent candidate or political party may state in writing within two days of being so invited by the Commission that it approves or disapproves of its identity as it appears on the samples.
(4) Unless the independent candidate or the political party disapproves of its identity under subsection (3) in writing, it shall not complain of unlawful exclusion from the election under this Act in relation to its identity appearing on electoral materials used for the election.
(5) An independent candidate or political party that fails to comply with an invitation by the Commission under subsection (3) shall be deemed to have approved its identity on samples of electoral materials proposed to be used for an election. - Proposed Amendments/Provisions to Enable Electronic Transmission of Election Results
The means of addressing the challenges associated with the electronic transmission of results to the National Electronic Register of Election Results is to remove the wide discretion currently granted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in determining the process for transmitting election results. In other words, there is a need for an explicit provision in the Electoral Act mandating that election results be electronically transmitted from each polling unit to the National Electronic Register of Election Results. This would, of course, require an amendment to the Electoral Act. It is, therefore, proposed that the relevant sections of the Electoral Act 2022 be amended to read as follows::
Section 50 (2) Electoral Act 2022
(2) Subject section 63 of this Act, voting at an election and transmission of results under this Act shall be in accordance with the procedure provisions in this Act.
Section 60 (1) – (5) Electoral Act 2022
(1) The Presiding officer shall, after counting the votes at the polling unit, enter the votes scored by each candidate in a form to be prescribed by the Commission as the case may be.
(2) The form shall be signed and stamped by the presiding officer and counter signed by the candidates or their polling agents where available at the polling unit.
(3) The presiding officer shall give to the polling agents and the police officer where available a copy each of the completed forms after it has been duly signed as provided under subsection (2).
(4) The presiding officer shall count and announce the result at the polling unit.
(5) The presiding officer shall electronically transmit the results including total number of accredited voters and the results of the ballot to the National Electronic Register of Election Results.
Section 62 (1) Electoral Act 2022
After the recording, announcement and electronic transmission of the result to the National Electronic Register of Election Results, the presiding officer shall deliver the result along with election materials under security and accompanied by the candidates or their polling agents, where available, to such person as may be prescribed by the Commission.
Tags:
Previous Article
Our Criminal Justice System
Next Article
Very apt. I am 💯 %in support
This is highly commendable. Independent candidacy will significantly sanitize the rot in our electrical system
INEC must be reformed
I think the amendments are good but how do we stop the indiscriminate declarations of independent candidacy? If we have too much independent candidates, there are effects, especially with funding and logistics of INEC who already spend exorbitant amounts of monies not giving us credible elections.
Also, how do we get this to the floor of the National Assembly and ensure its passage?
This is good. But can the academic qualification for the office of the president be peg at first degree certificate?
This secondary level looks somehow for someone that will be leading us as the president.
Even without a school certificate, if you’ve proven your worth as an autodidact, you should be qualified to govern a nation.
Commendable sir, next is the draconian law gagging freedom speech and expression
Results should not be announced until voters who came out to vote have voted.
Each party must have a representative in each polling unit who will only leave the polling unit after the votes have been counted and uploaded on the server and with a copy of the voting results
I’ll like to add that Every citizen of Nigeria, who has attained the age of eighteen years residing within or outside Nigeria at the time of the registration of voters for purposes of election to a legislative house, shall be entitled to be registered as a voter for that election *must have a valid international passport, national ID, or drivers licence as a means of identification*.
Criminal minded politicians can exploit diaspora voting as a means to manipulate the process.
The election should take place same day) from lower class to upper class. (State of assembly to President) and supreme court should conclude election petition before swearing in.
INEC requires significant reforms, and the responsibility of appointing the INEC Chairman should not rest solely with the President to ensure greater independence and impartiality
Electoral reform encouraging diaspora voting is supposed to have been in vogue due to the intercontinental spread of Nigerian citizens in other countries who wishes to exercise their franchise. The Judiciary and the Military needs to be reformed too where we will carefully look at their lapses and inconsistencies in exercising their duties to be able to extract the corrupt ones in the system to restore full sanity back in the system.
While this amendment accomodates diaspora voting and independent candidature as well as emphasizing electronic transmission of results, I think our electoral law should also ensure serious punishment like that for treasonable felony for electoral malpractices of any kind. We should further place all public office holders on minimum wage and a lump sum payment upon meritorious completion of their terms in office. Let’s eradicate politics as a profession and institute the art of selfless service.
💯 in support
I totally support these proposed amendments. However, we must strive to move away from the point where hard copies of election results are moved from point A to B, to a situation where all results reflects on the Electoral body’s data or results server as the votes are being cast. Thank you sir for a great work.
This is very good.
The idea of local government and state level collation center should be scrap out because that’s where all manners of rigging take place. Everything should be electronically devoid of Manuel interference.
Announcement of results after voting should be re announced if for any reason there’s a glitch,
Vote buying, and other electioneering malpractice should have stringent consequences.
Haven’t read carefully the draft bill, I would say it is very welcoming and very good for the purpose of having a transparent election, but nevertheless we still to address the area of punishment for any electoral officers for guilty of electoral fraud and as well as a serious punishment for the chairman of the commission if caught in electoral malpractice, very welcoming indeed if I may say
Beautiful work sir, I do have a few observations
1. For some reason don’t think putting the age for president makes too much sense as though someone who is 30 or 35 is incapable of holding such position especially when we now have an academic bench which say school cert
2. I would prefer that academic qualification should be raised higher and emphasis on verifiable. So for president at least a Masters while other HND or BSc
3. For electronic transmission, I believe also having a provision to guide real time viewing would make so much sense. So once it’s transmitted the agents goes to verify to know if it’s truly showing on the dashboard before the electoral officer leave the polling unit
4. The area of diaspora voting is very important but also requires strict laws to guide it, I feel that section has to be looked into the more like how would they vote, mode of verification and others issues like that should be greatly considered
A 10year post degree qualification should be mandatory
I propose at least a First degree academic qualifications for the office of the President, Governor, Senate and House of Representatives.
President should not be appointing INEC chairman.
This is a welcomed development. For me I just suggest we vote through Blockchain technology, voting where it’s decentralized that every Nigeria 🇳🇬 will have the right to vote anywhere around the world 🌍 to represent our collective efforts to make it make sense. With the Blockchain technology everything will be transparent and I suggest this Blockchain technology be strictly Nigerian built inhouse solid job well done for this electoral reform. I
Excellent! This is Great. A Pleasant Reform Indeed
A New Era of Voting in Nigeria: A Digital Voting Act Proposal
The biggest threat to democracy in Nigeria is electoral fraud, not lack of voter interest. Nigerians want change, but they do not trust the system. In the 2023 elections, only 27% of registered voters showed up. Why? Fear, violence, and a system that’s been compromised repeatedly.
It’s time for a better way to vote — secure, transparent, and verifiable.
I propose the Digital Voting Act, a legislative bill that enables all Nigerians to vote via a secure digital app developed by Nigerians, for Nigerians.
Here’s how it will work:
Key Features of the Digital Voting App:
1. NIN & Facial Recognition
Every voter will register using their National Identity Number (NIN) and scan their face to verify identity. No more underage or duplicate voters.
2. Blockchain-Backed Voting Ledger
Every vote is time-stamped and stored on a public, tamper-proof blockchain. This prevents vote tampering and removes dependence on INEC’s opaque collation system.
3. Live Public Dashboard
Real-time data displays:
Number of registered voters per polling unit, LGA, and state
Number of verified votes cast
Turnout rate
All publicly accessible
4. Community-Based Verification
Every voter is verified by a second stakeholder (e.g. community leader, local representative, or designated neutral party) to prevent impersonation.
5. QR Code Vote Receipt (Optional)
Voters can download a QR receipt that confirms their vote is in the system. Receipts do not show the candidate selected, only that the vote was successfully logged.
6. Offline Access & Public Kiosks
For rural areas without smartphones, local voting kiosks with the app installed will be set up under security.
7. Open-Source Code
The app’s code will be open for inspection to prevent hidden backdoors or manipulation. NGOs, foreign observers, and local coders can audit it.
8. Independent Oversight
Voting results will be monitored live by local and international observers. All data is mirrored and stored across multiple servers.
Problems It Solves (with Nigerian Data):
Low voter turnout: Only 27% voted in 2023 due to fear and lack of trust. Voting by phone increases participation.
Ballot snatching & violence: No physical votes = no ballot boxes to hijack.
Rigging: Real-time public data makes over-voting and inflated numbers impossible.
INEC’s unreliability: With decentralized data and open-source verification, Nigerians no longer rely on a single institution.
Access issues: Citizens abroad or in remote villages can now vote securely.
Final Words:
This is not just an app, it’s a revolution. The foundation of any true democracy is trust in the process. Right now, Nigeria does not have that. We need to build our own system, one that empowers people and protects their voice.
Let this be a call to action for developers, lawmakers, and every patriotic Nigerian: we need the Digital Voting Act.
Let’s code out corruption.
I totally agree with Jefferson’s recommendations. In addition, the App should be configured to carry the data of all registered voters in all the polling units. And at least 5 of such machines assigned to one polling units.
To vote, a voter selects the party or candidate of his/her choice, thumbprint. Once this is done, the machine identifies the voter and the vote is accepted and immediately transferred to the central viewing and collation centres .
This way, multiple voting is completely eliminated
1. Diaspora Voting
Amend Section 77(2) CFRN 1999:
“Every citizen of Nigeria, whether residing within or outside Nigeria, who has attained the age of eighteen years shall be entitled to be registered as a voter and to vote in any election.”
Insert Section 12(1)(f) Electoral Act 2022:
“The Commission shall create guidelines for citizens abroad to register and vote using digital platforms verified via National Identification Number (NIN).”
2. Independent Candidacy:
Amend Sections 65, 106, 131, 177 CFRN 1999 & Section 101 Electoral Act 2022
“A candidate may contest independently if verified by the Commission and supported by a defined number of verified voters in the constituency.”
Amend Section 42 Electoral Act 2022:
Ballot papers shall include party logos or candidate photos for independents. Digital ballots must display identity clearly.
3. Digital Voting System
Section X: Digital Voting and Result Transmission
“Voting shall be done electronically via a secure app or platform approved by the Commission and verified via NIN.”
Section Y: Transparency and Audit
(1) “Total registered voters per ward, LGA, and state shall be displayed on the digital platform prior to voting.”
(2) “Results shall be transmitted in real-time from polling units to a National Blockchain Register.”
(3) “All votes must be time-stamped, traceable (non-personally), and tamper-proof.”
(4) “Each voter shall receive a scannable receipt post-vote.”
(5) “Independent observers and parties shall have live access to all tallies.”
PROBLEMS SOLVED:
Ends ballot box snatching and physical rigging.
Empowers 17+ million Nigerians in diaspora to vote.
Encourages youth participation via app-based voting.
Exposes padded figures with public real-time tallies.
Reduces violence with remote and verified voting.
Removes exclusive party control over candidacy.
Builds public trust with audit trail and vote receipts.
This is commendable. You’ve shown that without an iota of doubt, you believe the birth of a nation called Nigeria is possible. May God give us the grace to realize this noble pursuit in Jesus’ name, Amen.
This is a good one, my worry is how to push this to scale through. The behaviour of the present occupiers of government is to do everything to avert the normal as visible in the Rivers example. How can this be pushed? The issue of independent candidacy is novel and can only be meaningful if electronic transmission of results will be given the force of law. The diaspora voting has it’s challenges especially with INEC’s disposition to manipulate results for the party in power, will the provision for diaporan voting not give way for manipulation?
Key point in Ghana
1) Africa (IEC) says the Electoral Act allows political parties to attach their own seals to ballot boxes to ensure they are not tampered with.
2) Names, and photographs of candidates and party symbols on ballot papers
3) 1. Including agents of political parties in ballot printing to monitor the production of ballot papers
4. Allowing political parties to fix their seals on ballot boxes to safeguard the boxes
5. Special voting, proxy voting and prisoners voting.
6) Fax result
7) all Result uint should announce in the Ward not collation to wards result .
8) register House media should announce result without waiting INEC
Makes sense 👍🏾no wonder yours went well
The burden of proof of the winner should be on INEC and not on the loser. Also the physical Collation Centre should be abrogated. All results should be transmitted directly from the the polling units to the IREV which becomes the collation centre.
This is good, well done sir.
In addition to this the enabling laws of INEC needs to be revised to guarantee it’s autonomy from the executive.
There should a board of commissioners with at least 7 and a max of 11 members. The members of the board will be nominated by a parliamentary joint committee on electoral matters. The chairman and deputy chairman of the board will be elected by the board from amongst their members. The board will set up committees as required. There’ll also be an advisory council made up of representative of political parties, security agencies and other organs involved in electoral matters that will also advise the board.
The Governing Board will oversee the strategic direction of the INEC.
Appoint the Chief Electoral Commissioner and senior officials.
Oversee policy formulation and performance monitoring of regional offices.
Approve and allocate budgets to Regional Electoral Offices (REOs).
B. Operational Leadership (Chief Electoral Commissioner)
The Chief Electoral Commissioner, appointed by the Governing Board, will handle day-to-day operations and report to the board.
Funds will be allocated directly from the Consolidated Revenue Fund to INEC and its substructures.
Regular audits by the national audit office and public financial disclosures( publishing it’s annual report and Audit financial statement of account).
The board will report directly to parliament on its activities and there’ll also be an independent inspectorate to oversee the activities of INEC which will also report to parliament
This is excellent.
Most of the concerns I have have been suggested. My concern is about universal adult sufferage. I think that it is encouraging vote buying. But, there is a human right angle to it that makes it delicate.
I also observed that there seems to be typo in the proposal regarding Section 50(2); on electronic transmission of votes.
I think it’s necessary to insert a subsection under the Responsibilities of INEC section to allow for extension of voting hours where by INEC’s own fault, voting materials arrive late and balloting does not commence at the scheduled hour. Or where there is large voters turnout in a PU more than the INEC staff can handle within the allotted time for balloting.
The proposal is good.
Thanks Mr. Dele.
This is the way💯
This proposal cover areas that need serious attention. Kudos to the proponents. First, i will want to suggest more urgent work need to be done on the proposal with respect to diaspora voting. I believe we are all mindful of the insane insincere nature of our political class, and we must preempt their next move. If this proposal is adopted and the constitution is amended to allow for diaspora voting, the likelihood that the ruinous political class will take their rigging to the diaspora level must not be underestimated. Therefore, the proposed amendment must be crafted to cover and prevent this potentially new rigging avenue. Again, i want to assume that we can all decode this point. I will expatiate if necessary. Thanks to everyone, as we all continue to strive for good governance.
For the amount spent on so called irev, election results should be uploaded and visible in real time for all to see. Any “glitches or technicalities” may be considered manipulative. Money spent for election by political parties should be reduced. INEC must be answerable to the people and/or punished for any misconduct. Nigerians abroad should be able to vote through a reliable and secure means.
There shall be a national election results board where election results shall be displayed in real time and accessible to journalists, observers and other interested party. It shall have a date stamp of INEC for security purpose.
Very impressive,but one more thing,the criteria for the office of the president must be atleast first degree( Bsc )
I totally support this bill, its a must-Do bill that nigerians must all come together to enforce.
Thank you for your effort so far.
With respect to independent candidacy (applicable to non-independent candidacy as well), I recommend that some form of deterrent be put to eliminate pretenders and time-wasters, as well as to make the idea practicable.
Here is my solution to that: INEC shall mandate all candidates, whether independent or not, to make a good faith deposit to the commission, a monetary sum that could be refunded not later than two weeks after election results have been announced. The refund becomes compulsory if, only if, the candidate scored not less than 10% (ten percent) of the total accredited voters for that position so desired. Failure to meet this condition means the candidate forfeits the deposited amount to the commission. Also, if no candidate in that particular election meets this condition, all candidates must be refunded accordingly.
Now, before I make my recommend on how the good faith deposit be calculated, I wish to highlight the reasoning behind it.
Aspirants for public office are supposed to be people-driven, and in recent times, Nigerians have shown a tendency for fundraising towards distress persons, heroic persons, etc., so nothing less is expected of them when it comes to persons whom they are willing to entrust their votes to lead them.
To eliminate the usual arbitrariness employed in such matters as conditional deposits and levies, I recommend a more nuance approach:
For governorship and legislative (both state and federal) positions nationwide, the sum of one thousand naira shall be multiplied to 10% of the total accredited voters for the last election conducted for that position.
Say, in a state where the total accredited voters for the governorship position in the 2023 elections was five hundred thousand (500,000), then the good faith deposit expected from each candidate vying for that position in 2027 in that particular state becomes:
500,000 x 0.1 x 1,000 = #50,000,000
(Fifty million naira only)
Each candidate in that state is expected to deposit not less than fifty million naira to the commission. Remember, this is refundable.
Raising such amount of money should not pose problems for candidates with a true worth of popularity and can be easily crowdfunded (as a bare minimum, 50,000 persons donating 1,000 naira each, going by the above example). This sum being refundable makes things even easier.
A similar method shall be applied to the position of the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, with the only difference being the multiplier amount, which shall be two hundred naira (200) in this case as opposed to the one thousand naira (1,000) in the earlier case.
Let’s assume the 2023 election figures showed 22,000,000 (twenty-two million) accredited voters, the expected good faith deposit for 2027 becomes:
22,000,000 x 0.1 x 200 = #440,000,000
(four hundred and forty million naira only)
Now, the multipliers, 200 and 1000, have, admittedly, some randomness to them yet logical, considering the people-driven angle to it all; 200 for the larger-voting-pool presidential position, and 1000 for the more localized positions.
Of course, these numbers can be tinkered and are open to debate. However, I would highly recommend that only an upward review be considered; otherwise, in my humble opinion, it only makes a mockery of the idea of people-centric candidates.
Please, everyone/anyone, let me know what you think. I am open to discussing this further.
My idea on making every vote count will come later, but I’m afraid it won’t be free from technology, not next-gen tech, but one that has been around for over twenty years.
Thank you very much for publishing this proposal. This is a step in the right direction.
In support
Great!
Diaspora voting is long overdue..
Independent candidacy might pose a challenge as thousands of Nigerians will want to contest as independent candidates. Stringent measures will be needed to separate the serious from the unserious.
thank you so much all the well meaning Nigerian. INDEED ALL THESE AMENDMENT IS WELL ORGANSED AND I THINK WITH IT WE SHALL GET NEW NIGERIA THAT WORKS AND EFFECTIVE AND CARRY ALONG ALL CITIZENS. WITH THIS BILL THERE WILL BE NO MORE CRIMINAL ELEMENT. TRANSPARENT TRANSPARENT TRANSPARENT ALL THE WAY SUPPORT THE BILL WITH ALL NY LIFE💯
Part A: Feedback on Proposed Amendments
Thank you for taking the initiative to propose these amendments to the Electoral Act 2022. It is clear that much thought and consideration have gone into these, and I recognize the value of engaging in this critical discussion. While acknowledging I am not a lawyer, I think it’s crucial to prioritize the fundamental aspects of our electoral system, ensuring that every Nigerian Vote within Nigeria truly counts. This emphasis on establishing a robust, transparent system that guarantees the sanctity of each ballot is paramount; ensuring every vote counts is how we turn Nigerians into true citizens – this is the hill to die on and the foundation on which we must build.
While your proposed legislative amendments address various electoral matters, they lack focus on electoral fraud, which requires targeted, technology-driven reforms. Additionally, the inclusion of contentious subjects like diaspora voting and independent candidacy risks political impasse and a diffusion of our primary goal. While the amendment pertaining to electronic transmission has potential, it lacks depth in fraud prevention, specifically regarding the backend infrastructure’s technical specification and regulation.
Critique of Proposed Amendments
Diaspora Voting
Although the objective of expanding voter access is commendable, and I stand to benefit, diaspora voting remains a historically contentious issue in Nigeria due to logistical challenges, such as voter registration abroad, and apprehensions regarding potential fraud within overseas voting systems. The proposal lacks specificity regarding the secure collection, verification, and integration of diaspora votes into the national tally, thus introducing potential vulnerabilities. Furthermore, it risks political opposition, is tangential to the primary issue of electoral fraud, and may complicate the reform process by inciting debate on a divisive subject.
Independent Candidacy
Similar to diaspora voting, independent candidacy is a contentious reform that has faced historical opposition due to concerns regarding electoral fragmentation and the stability of the party system. The amendment increases administrative complexity for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and voters with limited education, without addressing the core mechanisms of electoral fraud. It also risks overburdening the reform agenda and potentially impeding progress on more critical changes.
Electronic Transmission of Results
Mandating electronic transmission represents a positive step; however, the current proposal lacks sufficient robustness. The mere requirement to transmit results to a “National Electronic Register of Election Results” does not ensure transparency, security, or auditability. This amendment addresses fraud superficially and fails to rectify critical vulnerabilities, including:
Absence of specifications for the backend’s security, architecture, or regulatory compliance, rendering it susceptible to hacking, insider tampering, and system failures, as evidenced by the issues with the INEC Result View Portal (IReV) during the 2023 election.
Lack of provisions for audit trails (centralized/decentralized), or third-party verification, which are crucial for detecting fraud.
Results are not mandated to be publicly accessible in real-time, thereby diminishing trust and oversight.
Absence of penalties or contingencies for non-compliance, such as in the event of transmission failure.
Due to the length and complexity of my comment, I will split it into two parts. The suggested alternative to the proposed amendments, focusing on addressing the identified shortcomings as I see it, will follow in a subsequent post.
Great job sir. Our commitment to make Nigeria a better place for all remains absolute. This is 100% on point sir.
The NPF should be mandated to prosecute Electoral offenders.
2. Any result not transmitted in record time shall be cancelled and Presiding officer prosecuted.
Achieving electoral amendments in Nigeria requires a blend of these strategies. For instance, a campaign could start with public advocacy to raise awareness, followed by lobbying lawmakers with specific proposals (e.g., mandating electronic results transmission). Simultaneously, legal challenges could clarify existing laws, while international partners provide technical support for implementation. Strengthening INEC and pushing for technological upgrades would ensure reforms are actionable, while civic education lays the groundwork for lasting change.
The only challenges is that it’s a collective effort which these ruiners has already divided.
I am with you, Dele. Let’s go for it.
Possible to extend the proposal to include the input from Ibe Jefferson?
Thank you for this sterling effort.
My contributions are as follows:
1. Diaspora voting: suggest or prescribe a credible method/modality for diaspora voting. Options may include in person polling booths in the diaspora embassies, secure mail voting and secure electronic voting. Security of votes to be guaranteed and monitored by a joint effort by Nigerian and foreign security agencies with a private group as a checking force.
2. Electronic transmission of election results: the law should stipulate a continuous real time update of the National Electronic Register of Election Results during elections.
Great work sir. Thank you so much for all that you do for the emancipation of this country..
Is it possible to add explicitly that the presiding officer shall electronically transmit the results from the polling unit or before leaving the polling unit? Just so that there won’t be a reason to say that the result recorded at the polling unit was tampered with on the way to the collation centre or turned out to be different from what was electronically uploaded at the collation centre.
Another worrying thing is the level of understanding or education of the electorate particularly from the Northern region of the country. Thus underpin the arrogance of their leaders towards the other regions. People who does not know their left from right are the ones determining who leads the country. No one should be surprised come next Ramadan, all schools in the northern region would be shut as those five states seem to have gotten away with that absurdity.